19-10-2014 – SCOAN SERVICE HOLD ON TO GOD WISEMAN RACINE


Join The SCOAN Choir to cultivate an atmosphere of worship and belief. Remember, an atmosphere of belief is an atmosphere conducive for the Spirit of God to enter and indwell. So open your hearts to the Word, faith and Spirit of the most High God as His presence ushers us into today’s live service With Wise Man Racine is on the altar to deliver the Word of God which heals, saves, blesses, delivers, judges and rules over all in a message titled, “Hold On To God”

TB Joshua Collaped Building – More Like Solving a Puzzle!


Judging from the way TB Joshua revealed his prophetic message on the collapse of the building at his church, one would be stark unwise to take any of his words at face value. Amidst loads of conspiracy theories on-line for those responsible for the tragedy, this post attempts to pay closer attention to the words of TB Joshua on the masterminds behind the building collapse, to see if we can arrive at an educated guess. As can be seen from his prophecy of the building collapse, when he speaks, he may well be revealing very exclusive information cloaked in his simple speech. Also, from the way TB Joshua spoke of the incident, he appears very sure of the orchestrator’s but has chosen to remain silent over it, waiting for the full wrath of God to be poured on them. We did come along a conspiracy theory on nairaland that suggested that the SCOAN building must have been demolished by the Illuminati. Whilst not agreeing with every part of the theory, there is good reason to consider some of the points therein. Considering TB Joshua’s words since the event closely, one can be almost convinced as why the conspiracy theorist on nairaland attributes this catastrophe to the Illuminati. We forthwith explain why.

Note this is an assumption reached by carefully following TB Joshua’s comments on the tragedy and piecing together the minute details he revealed on the subject, week by week and piece by piece until they make a complete sense…more like solving a puzzle.

 

  • First, it has to be a GROUP, not an individual as he says in the words:

What we are seeing here, the revelation of God; has been challenged by SOME GROUP: you know what I mean? The finger God, here we are seeing here has been challenged by SOME GROUP: I’ll not say more than that.

  • Secondly, it has to be an elite group of international repute, as we can deduce from his words on the third week following the building collapse:

This is A HIGH LEVEL ISSUE, boko haram, they don’t have up to one percent of the people that did this job. They are just minute. IT IS AN INTERNATIONAL ISSUE… IT IS A WORLD ISSUE.

  • Thirdly, it has to be a group that has various classes and strata of people and professionals in its ranks as is seen from his words:

…You know SATAN ENTER HUMAN; enter our family, brother, DIFFERENT PEOPLE, HE CAN ENTER THE RELIGIOUS PERSON…, HE CAN ENTER PASTOR, BISHOP, REVEREND, POLITICAL PEOPLE, HE CAN ENTER MILLIONAIRE, HE CAN ENTER SOLIDER, POLICE, HE CAN ENTER ANYONE TO DO THIS JOB.

  • Fourthly, it has to be a group that professes some measure of spiritual power, which he challenges them to use to raise up the dead they killed, if they want an escape from the coming wrath, as we can deduce this from the words:

…You remember what I said; I said; IF THEY CAN RESURRECT THESE PEOPLE, THEY WILL NOT JOIN THESE PEOPLE.

  • Fifthly, it has to be a group that has a lot of financial resources at its disposal to mastermind such a heinous act as TB Joshua says in these words:

If God deals with the servants, you would not understand, it would not bring any lesson, errand boys sent to do this job you will not learn anything from it, [God will deal with] THE BOSS, THE FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS…”

  • Sixthly, it appears to be a group that heralds the worship of Satan and have a certain power domineering mindset that no one should challenge as TB Joshua is constantly doing as can be highlighted from the words:

“…It is that Satan that did it…” …You know SATAN ENTER HUMANS; “…THESE PEOPLE; THEY JUST WANT TO KNOW who TB Joshua; that is all, they want to know how great my God is…”

  • Seventhly, TB Joshua has been attacked in the past by clergy, PFN, CAN and others, but to indicate the nature of this attack he seemed to imply that it is a new attack; a new challenge; a new breed of foes, which is why he stated:

“…Since the beginning of my calling this is THE GREATEST TRIAL i have ever seen…”

  • Can you think of any other group or association that fits the bill? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments.

 

Those INVOLVED In TB Joshua Building Tragedy


TB Joshua Church Nigeria | tbjfansuk.wordpress.com

To some extent, we at TB Joshua Fans UK have conducted serious investigative journalism alongside security and building expects on the tragedy that befell the Synagogue Church of all Nation’s in Lagos on the 12th Sept, 2014 headed by Prophet TB Joshua, and some of our findings would shock you to the bone. The incident sparked up online media war against TB Joshua as though he was the cause of the building collapse. Sadly, the majority of the insults came from comments left on the publications posted on various websites. In the course of my discussion with people, I have witnessed what I would call a ‘marmite effect’, due to the hatred nursed against TB Joshua over the years.

Recently Prophet TB Joshua disclosed during on of the Sunday service that “the people behind the SCOAN tragedy are a group of people who want to challenge HIS GOD, they are Politicians, Pastors and also some are from other countries”

PEOPLE/PARTIES INVOLVED

Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor the  President of CAN, It is a known fact that Ayo is a very close friend and confidant of President Goodluck Jonathan and as we all know Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor hates TB Joshua with passion, and his reasons are:

  • TB Joshua popularity around the world – He outshines them all.
  • Many of their members started confessing publicly. Video Proof
  • His attempt to stop SCOAN influx

What people don’t know is that through the ministry of interior CAN (Ayo) and Jonathan Goodluck controls the influx of religious

Machine Gun Preacher - Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, President of CAN

Machine Gun Preacher – Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, President of CAN

Christian visitors coming into Nigeria which has seen most of T.B. Joshua’s visitors denied entry visa’s to Nigeria. If T.B. Joshua or The SCOAN is not a member of CAN why should CAN care who visits him? One of our investigators based in the UK among others, have been refused Nigeria visa because they were going to visit the SCOAN but as soon as they changed their reason for the visit to business their visas were approved.

What the perpetrators of this crime didn’t know was that they thought The SCOAN was just full of Nigerian visitors and a small number of foreign visitors. After the orchestrated collapse of the building, it became clear and very embarrassing the shear number of foreigners involved especially South Africans. If it was only Nigerians due to the disregard of life for fellow citizens, it would have been pushed under the bridge with T.B. Joshua has to live with this burden for the rest of his life. Not so?

Head of the emergency services: As far as he is concerned, the problem is a structural failure and that a test in a so-called lab will determine if it was so. “Please note, our pressman was with the Lagos State Material Testing Agency visited the scene. He made sure he followed the every inch during the time they spent at the SCOAN. Every concrete tested with their machine proved to be satisfactory” The same tune by the governor of Lagos and the same tune from the president. Has anyone asked why the Nigerian authorities were so scared when they realized that South Africa was sending in investigators. They quickly, with the help of the Nigerian Tribune, came up with an article about President Zuma, his relationship with a presidential candidate, the sizable 9.3 million dollars trying to make it seem like there is a diplomatic row between the two countries even to the extent of comparing both economies and how bad South Africa was doing. Such writing is not done by unschooled journalists; such writing is done by crafty politicians who have an agenda in mind – to create confutation by putting pressure and/or bullying the South Africans into submission.

OTHER COUNTRIES

A stunning new report by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) circulating in the Kremlin today states that the Obama regime was behind the horrific 12 September attack that utilized the much feared “Jericho Weapon” on The Synagogue, Church Of All Nations in Lagos, Nigeria (SCOAN) that left over 40 Christian men, women and children dead.

According to this report, Nigerian authorities have become “greatly alarmed” over the unprecedented rise of the Ebola virus in West African and have “strongly advised” all Christian churches to stop their communion rites over fears this practice will spread the disease.

The SCOAN, however, not only refused to stop their communion rites, this report continues, but also began operations to help the victims of Ebola in other neighboring countries, which the joint US-Nigerian Army Special Operations Command (NASOC) deemed a “national security threat”.

In response to SCOAN refusing to comply with its governments Ebola directives, this report says, Russian military intelligence analysts on 11 September detected a “highly secretly armed” US Navy Lockheed C-130 Hercules aircraft [photo bottom left] assigned to Fleet Logistics Support Squadron SIX TWO (VR-62, nicknamed the Nomads) depart from its Florida base at Naval Air Station Jacksonville (NAS Jacksonville) and land at the US Naval Expeditionary Base Camp Lemonnier located at Djibouti’s Djibouti-Ambouli International Airport, which is the primary base of operations for the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) in the Horn of Africa.

After refueling/rest, this report continues, this US Navy C-130 departed Camp Lemonnier in the early hours of 12 September and flew to Lagos, Nigeria, where from 11:30-11:54 [Central European Time Zone (UTC+01:00)] it circled the SCOAN compound [Photos 2nd and 3rd left] then departed after the church was destroyed in what is described as an “implosion-type” event occurring at 12:44 as evidenced by security camera video.

This SVR report notes that the implosion of the SCOAN compound was “nearly identical” to the destruction of the infamous Building 7 on 11 September 2011, thus bringing to fears that the US Navy in its Nigerian attack last week used the same type of “directed weapons technology” to kill these innocent Christians.

To the exact destructive power of the “Jericho Weapon” [The Battle of Jericho is a battle in the biblical Book of Joshua where “sound” was used to destroy the enemy fortress walls.] believed to have destroyed these Christians, this report says, have been best described by US Doctor-Scientist Judy D. Wood, who in compiling her evidence of a directed energy weapon being used to destroy Building 7, described its horrific ability to turn solid matter into nanoparticles.

As the Obama regime has ordered an additional 3,000 of its troops to Africa to fight the Ebola virus, this report concludes, the killing of these Christians in Nigeria on 12 September clearly shows the deadly lengths this much feared government will go to in order to protect its empire

Source:  http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1805.htm

 

 

OPEN LETTER TO CORONER O.A KOMOLAFE – ON SCOAN BUILDING


Dear Coroner,

I write this ‘open letter’ for your perusal having good hope in your impartial contemplation; emboldened because your good office afforded opportunity to members of the public with evidence material that will assist the court in its findings to indicate their interest.

Since the incident occurred at the SCOAN premises, online and print media have been awash with volumes of editorials on the catastrophe. The sordid fact about these reports is that most have turned out to be greatly misleading. They seem to be exploiting the tragedy for further barrage of criticism meant to destroy the SCOAN – criticisms that have trailed Joshua since the eighties.

It is a disastrous event and even as the whole nation mourns with the SCOAN, it should be evident that Joshua is the Chief mourner. No one should be permitted to cry more than the bereaved; or make frantic efforts to contort people’s perception from actuality to imagination, as much of the media have done in the past weeks. It is agonizing to watch how from their untruths, joined one to the other, the erroneous inference surfaced that the collapse of the building resulted from a ‘structural failure’ of the building. These are still being purported despite the CCTV videos put forth by The SCOAN to reveal what actually happened to the building. In wake of these events, I, having thoroughly studied the released CCTV videos and available survivor accounts, forthwith cite TEN REASONS why the collapse of the SCOAN building was definitely preplanned and effected by ‘controlled demolition’.

  1. NO ABSOLUTE COLLAPSE BY STRUCTURAL FAILURE: The ‘structural failure’ collapse theory on the synagogue building collapse is first rendered implausible by one major problem. The simple fact that ‘structural failure’ has never — prior to or after 9/12, caused a consequent complete, rapid and symmetrical collapse of buildings. Defenders of the ‘structural failure’ theory seldom, if ever mention this simple fact. There is also a reverse truth to this fact, that aside from the alleged case of 9/12, structural failure has never caused large storey buildings to utterly collapse like a pack of cards. The reverse truth is that every previous absolute collapse has been caused by the procedure known as ‘controlled demolition’, in which explosives capable of cutting steel have been placed in crucial places throughout the building and then set off in a particular order. To see how ludicrous the claim is that the collapse of the synagogue building was induced by structural failure, here are other facts typical of controlled demolition.
  1. SUDDEN ONSET: in controlled demolition, the onset of the collapse is sudden, one moment, the building is perfectly motionless, the next moment it suddenly begins to collapse. But buildings even when overweighed do not suddenly buckle or break. So in a structural failure caused collapse, if we had any examples of such, the onset would be gradual. It would begin by tilting to one side or by showing Cracks and fissures in the building when subjected to overwhelming live and dead weight; but there were no signs of tilting to any side or cracking or breakage. No pillar was broken off. The building was perfectly motionless up to the moment it began to collapse.
  1. STRAIGHT DOWN: The most important thing in a controlled demolition of a tall building close to other buildings is that it comes straight down, into, or at least close to its own footprint, so that it does not harm other buildings. A phenomenon which a building expert calls ‘falling inwardly’. The whole art or science of controlled demolition is oriented primarily around this goal. As Mark Loizeaux, the president of controlled demolition. Inc. has explained, “To bring [a building] down as we want, so …. no other structure is harmed,” the demolition must be completely planned,” using “the right explosive [and] the right pattern of laying the charges.” (Else 2004) if the six storey building had fallen over, it would have caused enormous amount of damage to the smaller structures around the building. According to what is alleged by many critics, accepting that ‘structural failure’ produces collapses that perfectly mimicked the collapses that have otherwise been produced only by precisely placed explosives, is verging on insane.
  1. ALMOST FREE-FALL SPEED: Buildings brought down by controlled demolition collapse at almost free-fall speed. This occurs because the supports for the lower floors are destroyed so that when the upper floors come down, they encounter no resistance. The fact that the collapse of the synagogue building mimicked this feature of controlled demolition is seen in the CCTV video released by the SCOAN. The building collapsed in approximately 4 seconds. If the building had collapsed through a structural failure, the lower floors with all their steel and concrete would have provided some resistance. The upper floors could not have fallen through them at the same speed as they would fall through the air. Accepting that this building collapsed due to structural failure is accepting a charade, because every floor of every storey, fell as though nothing existed below it but air. The storey’s must all have been falling simultaneously to reach the ground in such short amount of time. This highlights a feature in the method known as controlled demolition. Each floor of a building is destroyed at just the moment the floor above it is about to strike it, thus the floors fall simultaneously, and in virtual free-fall. Only well placed explosives can do this. This is what happens in controlled demolition.
  1. TOTAL COLLAPSE: The alleged ‘structural failure’ collapse theory is even more decisively ruled out by the fact that the collapse was total. The large six-storey building collapsed into piles of rubble lesser than the height of the ground floor. How was that possible? There is no way a structural failure could cause a global that is total collapse at virtually free-fall speed. Some walls should most certainly have remained standing, even earthquakes, which have produced some partial collapses, have never produced total collapses. As is seen in the photo; each floor of the storey- building in the rubble was seen piled one upon the other like slices of bread. synagogue-robble-1-620x330
  1. SLICED STEEL: In controlled demolitions of high-rise buildings, explosives are used to slice the steel columns and beams into pieces. A representative of controlled Demolition. Inc. has said of RDX, one of the commonly used high explosives, that it slices steel like a “razor blade through a tomato”. The steel is, moreover, not merely sliced: it is sliced into manageable lengths. As Controlled Demolition, Inc., says in its publicity: “Our DREXSTM systems… segment steel into pieces matching the lifting capacity of the available equipment.” The collapse of the synagogue building, it seems, somehow managed to mimic this feature of controlled demolitions as well. Studying the building collapse site reveals that much of the steel has been chopped up into sections that can easily be loaded onto the equipment’s that were cleaning up the rubble.SLICED STEEL copy
  1. PULVERIZATION OF CONCRETE AND OTHER MATERIALS: Another feature of controlled demolition is the production of A LOT OF DUST, because explosives powerful enough to cut steel columns will pulverize concrete and most other metallic and non-metallic substances into tiny particles. The CCTV video of camera 6 reveal so much dust emanating from the building sides due to the implosion. Observations at the collapse site also reveal that there was nowhere near enough rubble to account for the entire six-storey building; No single concrete block remained upon another; not even one electrical appliance like an air conditioner or refrigerator could be recovered from the building. How on earth can this happen through structural failure? The only explanation for this occurrence is the fact that most metallic constituents of the six-storey building together with the concrete were pulverized into fine powder. This fact creates a problem for the theory of ‘structural failure’ collapse, whose only available energy was gravitational energy. This energy would have been sufficient to break some of the concrete into fairly small pieces, but it would not have been anywhere close to the amount of energy needed to turn the concrete and virtually all the metallic contents of the building into tiny particles of dust.
  1. DUST CLOUDS: Yet another common feature of controlled demolition is the production of dust cloud. Incredible amounts of dust and smoke result when explosions eject concrete dust from the building with great energy. And as one can see by comparing videos on the web, the collapse of the synagogue six-storey guest house produced clouds that are very similar to those produced by controlled demolitions of other structures. The question of the source of the needed energy again rises, which by far exceeded the gravitational energy available. Besides the sheer quantity of energy needed, another problem with the ‘structural failure’ collapse theory is that gravitational energy is wholly unsuited to explain the production of these dust clouds. This is most obviously the case in the first few seconds. You can see thick clouds of pulverized concrete being ejected within the first two seconds. That’s when the relative motion of the top of the building to the intact portion was only a few feet per seconds. A great amount of very fine concrete dust is ejected from the base of the building very early in the collapse when concrete slabs would only have been bumping into each other. A Zambian, Melvin Bwalya, who was standing very close to the building when it fatally caved in said to the Zambian newspaper: the church that “…I collapsed and fell a few meters away from the building where I was buried in A HEAP OF DUST.”
  1. HORIZONTAL EJECTIONS: Another common feature of controlled demolition is the horizontal ejection of other materials, besides dust, from those areas of the building in which explosives were set off. In the case of the synagogue building, the CCTV Video from camera 6 reveal that large blocks of concrete and heavy pieces of steel were ejected from the areas of the building in which explosives were set off to great distances from the building. But gravitational energy is, of course, vertical, so a collapse by structural failure cannot even begin to explain these horizontal ejections.
  1. SOUNDS PRODUCED BY EXPLOSIONS: Still another common feature of collapse induced by explosion’s are sounds and demolition rings, in which a series of small explosions run rapidly around a building. This feature was also manifested by the collapse of the synagogue guest house. Like all the previous features except the cutting of the steel columns inside the building. This one could be observed by witnesses. And as we have seen in the reports, there is abundant testimony to the existence of such sounds before and during the collapse of the synagogue building. A fact which was confirmed by a survivor of the incident. khathuathelo Ramovha speaking to the BBC expressed how He heard a very small sound shiiiiii….shiiiiii….shiiiiii – something like a wired bomb that had to run that wire before it could reach were the bomb is – rrrrrrrrrrrr…….grrrrrrrrrrrr so quick and wha… the building came down…..” A 39 years old Zambian businessman, Melvin Bwalya, was standing very close to the building when it fatally caved in. Speaking to Zambian Christian newspaper, ‘The Church’, also explained: “I JUST HEARD A HUGE BANG. I don’t remember anything from that moment because I am told I fainted.”

OTHER SUSPICOUS FACTS:

(a) Although we have already considered sufficient evidence for the theory that the building was being brought down by explosives, there is still more. Before the collapse of the building, it was recorded that at least four times, there was a crossing of a military airplane which appears to be a Hercules C-130 – a military aircraft, not civil. It remains a disturbing mystery, why and for what purpose a fighter plane was doing at midday over a residential area that many times (at least 4 times as the CCTV Camera shows) and, most especially, at close proximity over the synagogue building. It seems entirely bizarre, unserviceable and, therefore, entirely suspect.

(b) Finally, the date of the collapse of the building (September 12) refers by inference to a similar collapse of the towers of the World Trade Center of the United States on September 11, in the USA. It is therefore a logical connection of similar terrorism on The Synagogue Church of All Nations, led by Prophet T.B. Joshua.

Conclusion:

It is, in any case, already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the collapse of the synagogue guest house was done by controlled demolition; orchestrated by high level terrorists. Domestic terrorists like Boko haram in Nigeria could not have gotten access to the buildings to plant the explosives. They probably would not have had the courtesy to make sure that the building collapsed straight down, rather than falling over onto surrounding buildings. In the light of this situation and the facts discussed in this essay.

I do therefore request your good office, and the Government of Nigeria to take the Lead in finally exposing to the world the truth about how the synagogue building collapsed.

Ref: 9/11 attack on WTC controlled demolition of high rise building; implosionworld.com; Demolition Inc.

Stanley Oghogho – freelance Nigerian Journalist.

Building Experts View On TB Joshua’s Collapsed Building


Having read through most propaganda of TB Joshua haters online – the allegations of the people coming out of their woodwork with  nooses and stakes crying prosecute Him, prosecute Him, at the top of their voices.  Here are some thoughts on this new video for anyone who cares to be objective enough.

Watching the new CCTV video from TB Joshua on the synagogue building catastrophe really puts the tragedy in perspective for those who are not already impervious to the truth. The pressure fumes emanating from the sides of the building just seconds before its eventual dissolve shows that something most certainly exploded from within the building with excessive force. The fumes literally gushed out of the sides of the building with so much pressure that confirms the preceding effect of powerful explosives. The pressure fumes gushed out with such high velocity that they overtook a man hastily fleeing away from the disaster; though the man was already at a considerable distance from the building before the incident.

More so, if you watch the moment of the incident closely to the right of the screen, you can observe large concrete blocks literally flung high into the air at a far distance from the building; travelling in a parabolic path whilst in projectile motion. This confirms that the concrete blocks have gained momentum from an energy source (at a point) to be able to fly so high and far away from the building at such velocity. According to newton’s law of motion: A body will remain in its state of rest or uniform motion unless it is acted upon by a force.  Thus, the forceful projection of those concrete blocks totally reveals they were given an initial velocity by the violent explosions that occurred. This is in stark contrast to critic’s alleged theory of a structural defect caused collapse.  The ‘defect caused collapse’ theory would have been irrevocably established if and only if those concrete blocks were falling from rest with an initial velocity of zero – as a type of free fall under gravity.

Even If one were to be super-humanly gracious to these critics, by assuming the worst case scenario that the foundation structure of that building was weak, the truth resurfaces again that it had for long previously supported the building and hence was in some measure solid. Therefore, if their assumptions were in the least correct of it being a collapse due to structural defects, we should have witnessed the exact point where the dead and live weight of the building overwhelmed its allegedly ‘inadequate’ support. This would have been made known by cracks and fissures in the building walls and pillars. Hence, practically speaking, the building would not have collapsed entirely in just four seconds. If critic’s assumption were in the least correct, then, while the tragedy happened, the expected resistance of the allegedly inadequate support would also have been noticed according to newton’s third law which states that to every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. But there was nothing of this but the rapid dissolution of a six storey building in four seconds to an unrecognizable rubble.

In conformity with the above: a building and constructions expert who also attests to have watched several buildings being demolished during the Gautrain, reveals that a building that falls by itself due to a ‘structural defect’ will NOT:

  1. Fall down COMPLETELY FLAT; some walls will remain standing.
  2. Will NOT fall down INWARDLY; some will fall to the sides.
  3. Will NOT fall down at the SPEED this one fell, which was about four seconds.
  4. It should start showing CRACKS and FOREWARN that it is about to fall.

Someone on seeing this collapse said it collapsed like sugar crumbling. A South African survivor by name Van Der Byl who lost his wife in the tragedy insists that TB Joshua should not be blamed for the incident. His narration of the events leading to the incident gives further confirmations of the above points. The points gleaned from his statements can be summarized thus:

  1. He stated that there was NO WARNING SIGN that such a thing would happen.
  2. He affirmed that NONE of the PILLARS had broken off.
  3. He stated that The building did not TILT to any SIDE
  4. As they were in the dining room on the GROUND FLOOR, he just noticed that the opposite side BROKE OUT.
  5. In THREE SECONDS; the whole building crashed on top of them.
  6. HE classified the materials being used in the building at TOP QUALITY, including the steel.

Another survivor of the incident khathuathelo Ramovha speaking to the BBC expressed how He heard a very small sound shiiiiii….shiiiiii….shiiiiii – something like a wired bomb that had to run that wire before it could reach were the bomb is – rrrrrrrrrrrr…….grrrrrrrrrrrr so quick and wha… the building came down…..”

From about 00:34 of the video below:

It is very sad that people are feigning blindness to something as glaring as the truth that this is a premeditated and concerted attack on the SCOAN. How can anyone be so blind not to see that the dissolution of a large six storey building to a pile of rubble in just four seconds is not normal? Unfortunately, there as so many of such people, than those who have eyes and can see with them. Even If many people are so blind to these facts, we are glad not the leaders, especially the president of South Africa who is quoted to have said:

“…TB Joshua should be spared criticism for the collapse of a church building which resulted in the deaths of at least 84 South Africans…”The outpouring of criticism is unwarranted and calls for the Public Protector to be deployed to Nigeria are a gross over reaction,” the president said.

With this comment he seems to believe that the building was attacked, but this statement is a safe way of expressing what he believes while simultaneously not appearing to be subservient to TB Joshua’s stand on the issue. Nigeria, your hypocrisy stinks in every corner and alleyway, the manner in which you cry more than the bereaved.

Watch the full video below:

RESPONSE – SCOAN Critics on Building Tragedy is Controlled Demolition


TB Joshua Church Nigeria | tbjfansuk.wordpress.com

I have said it on Prime Time Discuss that for anybody to limit the cause of collapse of the building to foundation failure without addressing the mission of the aircraft at the premises amount intellectual laziness. Both Government and Nigeria media have been emotional in some ways in the manner they responded to the tragedy.

  1. The government official who spoke on channels and other media houses has concluded that the building collapsed as a result of structural defects even when no professional evaluation has been done, as for me that wasn’t good enough. A rescuer cannot do the work of professional.
  2. He made two contradictory statements in a spate of 24 hours. He initially said the building was originally two story converted to four storeys. The same person later on another TV interview said the building was originally 4 storey converted to six storey which of this statement do we believe?
  3. The government is laying too much emphasis on design and approval and nobody is seemed to be saying anything about the unusual presence of the plane. Even the Nigeria media down played the abnormal and suspicious manoeuvre of the aircraft. All they were after is to crucify T.B Joshua without waiting for outcome of the investigation.
  4. The size of the columns and beams I saw at the Church can hold even an 8 storey building. Possibly some over design just to make sure it was adequate to with stand likely induced stress.
  5. The Nigeria press rather than conduct investigative journalism continued to pour the venom on T.B Joshua as they have always done. Pertinent questions needs to be answered by NCAA and other agencies saddled with air traffic management. Salient questions needs answers; a) did the aircraft land at the airport? b). what was its mission? c) What did the people in the neighbourhood say about seen the Aircraft? d) What is the eyewitness account both at the mountain which is some ten kilometres away and at the Church?
  6. Those who gave account of the Aircraft said it was a Jet, not a commercial plane, it was moving slowly, at low noise, flew and manoeuvred above the building frontally across to the back as seen from clips to side of building where no one would see any dropping. The four times manoeuvre was possibly to ascertain a good location to drop any device. The ground columns at the back were systematically knocked off by what could possibly be explosives owning to enormous dust which could also be from nano destructive effect. When you knock off about 15% of columns in a building the building could be subjected to sudden failure as seen on the clips. The manner the entire floor slabs collapsed together is not possible in a building that was originally 2 or 4 storey and later changed to 6 as claimed by the government. We expect some of the columns to stand and retain the floor slabs. In the synagogue case only two possibilities
  7.  Controlled demolition by improvised means the kind of manoeuvre and presence of aircraft seriously suggest the aircraft dropped something. It is also important for us to know that a device can be triggered even at a distance of 100km away irrespective of interference.

Ref: 9/11 attack on world trade centre alternative view controlled demolition of high rise building